Should ride-sharing drivers carry more insurance?
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
"The ride-sharing service Uber is fighting a bill in the Minnesota Legislature that would require the drivers to have additional insurance coverage," writes MPR News reporter Tom Scheck.
Uber General Manager Mike White said Thursday the legislation is unreasonable and could cost the state jobs.
Officials representing the Insurance industry are pushing for the bill, currently moving through committees in both the state House and Senate. Insurance Federation of Minnesota vice president Mark Kulda said the higher rate for Uber drivers is valid.
"When you're driving for Uber for money, it's a lot higher risk. You're driving in areas where you don't know where you are, you're having to look at your phone all of the time to pick up your rides," Kulda said. "Why should all of the other policy holders subsidize an Uber driver?"
Today's Question: Should ride-sharing drivers carry more for insurance?
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.