Dayton calls for halt to Fargo-Moorhead diversion, wants Minnesota review first
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
Gov. Mark Dayton has asked federal officials to halt construction of the Fargo-Moorhead flood diversion project until Minnesota can assess it.
• In May: Congress OKs $846 million for Red River flood diversion
• Related: 2013 Flood Season
Dayton last week wrote to Assistant Army Secretary Jo-Ellen Darcy, who oversees the Army Corps of Engineers' civil works program, that the federal agency should not allow the project to proceed until Minnesota can complete an environmental impact statement.
The Corps of Engineers and the Fargo-Moorhead Diversion Authority have proposed a $1.9 billion project that includes a dam on the Red River and diversion channel through North Dakota around Fargo to carry seasonal flood waters.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
In his Aug. 21 letter, Dayton wrote that it is "unacceptable that federal funding should be appropriated for the Fargo-Moorhead Project, or that construction should be allowed" before Minnesota's review. Dayton added that the "placement of the dam requires a permit" from the state.
Fargo-Moorhead Area Diversion Authority Chairman Darrell Vanyo called the governor's letter, "perplexing at best," and said he doesn't expect Dayton's intervention to stop work.
The authority supports the environmental review by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and will seek any necessary permit, said Vanyo, who met last week with DNR officials to discuss the environmental review.
DNR officials recently asked for an extension to complete the review, Vanyo said, and requested about $500,000 in additional funding from the diversion authority to pay for the work. The group already has provided about $1.3 million for environmental work.
The DNR's review was scheduled to be completed in May 2015, but the governor's letter indicated it would not be finished until the fall of 2015.
In his letter, Dayton noted that less than 10 percent of the project would benefit Minnesota, while the Fargo area would receive more than 90 percent.
"I urge no further federal efforts to be made to advance the Project to construction, including endorsing federal funding, issuing federal permits, and providing construction assistance to the Diversion Authority, until Minnesota has completed its environment review, and has had an opportunity to explore the implications of our analysis with the Corps and the State of North Dakota," Dayton wrote.
It will take time for army staff to review the governor's letter and prepare a response.
In June, the diversion authority began building the Oxbow-Hickson-Bakke ring levee, Dayton said, even though officials knew Minnesota had not completed its review.
"Given that land's elevation, it is highly likely that this levee has independent utility from construction of the overall project," Dayton wrote.
The Fargo-Moorhead Diversion project is also the subject of a federal lawsuit by residents upstream on the Red River who say the project would flood their farms and homes. The Minnesota DNR filed a friend-of-the-court brief in that case, challenging information provided by the diversion authority.
Construction of the project has been authorized by Congress, but the $800 million federal share has not been approved.
Local officials expect North Dakota state and local governments to pay 90 percent of the local cost with the Minnesota legislature asked to fund 10 percent.