Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Environmental News
Regina Medina
Updated:

Cookware group files lawsuit against Minnesota’s PFAS ban

A pan with food on it
The Cookware Sustainability Alliance filed the complaint against the commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency about the new law banning PFAS.
Scott Suchman for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

A cookware industry group filed a lawsuit in federal court Monday against a new Minnesota law, calling it unconstitutional.

The Cookware Sustainability Alliance filed the complaint against Katrina Kessler, the commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The complaint seeks a declaration that Amara’s Law, which went into effect on Jan. 1, is unconstitutional and unenforceable.

The law bans the sale and distribution of cookware containing PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals,” which have been linked to health problems, including cancer. The law covers 11 categories of everyday items including cookware, rugs and menstrual products.

The complaint claims the law discriminates against out-of-state commerce and imposes a burden on interstate commerce. It also alleges the law violates the Commerce Clause in the Constitution. The complaint seeks a declaration that the law is unconstitutional and unenforceable.

A spokesperson for Cozen O’Connor, the law firm representing the alliance, had no comment.

The MPCA said in a statement that it won’t comment on pending litigation, but that it believes the law is “legally sound.”

“It is estimated Minnesota taxpayers will have to spend $28 billion in the next 20 years to remove PFAS from wastewater and landfill leachate in the state,” the statement read. “We simply cannot clean our way out of this problem.” 

Mehmet Konar-Steenberg, a law professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law who specializes in constitutional and environmental law, said the plaintiffs appear to question the law’s value. 

“They’re saying that this law doesn’t deliver enough public health benefits when compared to the kind of difficulties it creates for out-of-state businesses to conduct business in Minnesota, they’re saying, on balance, this law just isn’t worth it,” he said.