Stay Curious. Stay Connected.
MailNewsletters♡Donate Now
Sign up
*Password must be at least 8 characters and contain one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number and one symbol.
Already have an account?
By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR's or APMG entities' programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.
Sign in to your profile
Forgot Password?
New to MPR News?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Reset Password

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

Still require assistance or not sure what your User Name is?
Welcome back
to news
for you
Email Verification

A verification code has been emailed to

Still awaiting the code?
Minnesota Housing News
Anika Besst

2040 plan continues after Minnesota Supreme Court decides not to look into lawsuit

An apartment under construction overlooking the Mississippi Rier
A bedroom and living space on the 16th floor of the Landmark Towers building in St. Paul overlooking the Mississippi River.
Anika Besst | MPR News

Go Deeper.

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Log inCreate a free Account

Like this?

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Show me!

Minneapolis city officials are hailing a decision issued earlier this week by the Minnesota Supreme Court to deny a petition for review by environmental groups who are concerned about the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan.

The 2040 Plan increases density in the city and ends single-family zoning.  

Citizen groups Smart Growth Minneapolis and the Minnesota Citizens for the Protection of Migratory Birds filed the lawsuit alleging that city leaders failed to do the required environmental review. And they argue that the dense, urban development allowed by the plan could adversely impact the health of waterways and bird habitats. 

Supporters of the plan say it addresses crucial issues for the city.

“[The] decision allows our city to continue our work to desegregate Minneapolis neighborhoods and build a diversity of housing options in every community,” said Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey in a statement. “It’s been a long time coming, and I am thankful Minneapolis can continue advancing our nation-leading housing work.”

The court’s decision does not end the lawsuit. The city is still trying to have the suit dismissed.

“The groups’ goal is simply to first and foremost call out the massive environmental impact," said plaintiff attorney Jack Perry.

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in favor of the citizen groups in 2021. The ruling said that residents could sue over comprehensive plans proposed by the local government under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act. The 2040 plan then faced setbacks related to project suspensions and re-starts. 

The 2040 Plan and its stalled projects were able to be picked up after a May ruling in an appeals court said that getting rid of the plan entirely would create “unnecessary hardship.”