Why it's unlikely ethics rules on Supreme Court gift disclosures will work
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
The Supreme Court is facing ethics questions since a ProPublica investigation reported that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas received luxurious trips from Republican donor Harlan Crow for more than two decades. The investigation says he failed to report these trips in his annual financial disclosures.
Stricter regulations went into effect several weeks ago, saying that federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, must disclose when they receive gifts and "personal hospitality."
But Northwestern University law professor emeritus Steven Lubet told NPR's Leila Fadel that he doubts the justices will comply with stricter disclosure rules.
This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
Interview highlights
On why Lubet doubts Thomas will comply with disclosure rules
Well, there's no enforcement mechanism. And in the past, the justices have adhered to them when they wanted to and not when they didn't. Justice Thomas says he'll follow the new interpretation. I don't really doubt him about that, but it's all very contingent because Chief Justice [John] Roberts and before him, Chief Justice [William] Rehnquist, have both said that the rules were validly applicable to the U.S. Supreme Court.
They're the Supreme Court. They do what they want.
On who enforces the rules that the Supreme Court makes
Well, they make the rules. There's an enforcement mechanism that, you know, the judges have life tenure. Short of impeachment, there's no penalty that's applicable to the judges at any level in the federal courts. There is a system in the lower courts of reporting, and it can lead to censure or reprimand, but it does not apply to the U.S. Supreme Court.
On whether there were pre-existing financial disclosure rules for federal judges and Supreme Court justices
There were rules before March 14th regarding gift disclosure. The justices said that they would comply with them. They do file annual reports disclosing, disclosing gifts. I would say that the previous rules definitely covered at least some parts of Justice Thomas's excursions with [Harlan] Crow. The new rules are much more specific and would absolutely require reporting of this sort of travel and lavish hospitality.
On what could be the answer to conflict of interest issues with Supreme Court justices
The Supreme Court is the only court in the United States that has never adopted a written code of ethics. Every other court has a written code. The U.S. Supreme Court has strenuously resisted announcing what its own standards of ethics are. That should be remedied. They should adopt a code of conduct. At the very least, this will let the public know what the justices expect of themselves, and there will be transparency that we have not had in the past.
Copyright 2023 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.