Tensions between freedom of the press and national security
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
A conversation on the risks and reasons for reporting secrets.
From the 2008 campaign right through his presidency President Barack Obama has talked a lot about the importance of transparency. But watchdog groups and journalists believe he has fallen far short of his commitment.
Indeed, New York Times journalist James Risen recently tweeted: "I plan to spend the rest of my life fighting to undo damage done to press freedom in the United States by Barack Obama and Eric Holder."
Risen joined MPR News with Kerri Miller for a conversation about the necessity and tension between transparent government and national security. Risen is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who covers national security issues for the New York Times.
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
P.W. Singer also joined the conversation. He's a senior fellow at the New America Foundation and author of the novel, Ghost Fleet.
Conversation highlights:
• "This is the first truly classified war in American history," said James Risen.
• "The definition of war has become fuzzy. The definition of national security has become fuzzy. The definition of journalist has become fuzzy," said PW Singer.
• "Today, as a reporter, to protect your sources, you have to willing to commit civil disobedience," said James Risen.
Do you think the First Amendment provides too much leeway to reporters, particularly when they are reporting on issues of national security? Share your views in the comments below.